Developing EM Resuscitationalists in Training Articles! Part 2- Pedro G. Lanzieri

ORIGINAL ARTICLE – Portuguese (Scroll down for English translation)

 

Medicina de Urgência e Emergência no Brasil

Sou médico formado em 2012 no Brasil, atualmente no 2o ano de residência de medicina interna. Trabalho com medicina de emergência (ME) há 2 anos.

A ME é diferente daquela praticada em qualquer outro setor. Variáveis como tempo, falta de acesso à história pregressa completa dos pacientes e a necessidade de estabelecer um vínculo com um paciente até então desconhecido são desafios da prática diária.

A formação do médico com especialização em emergência e urgência é relativamente nova no Brasil. Até então, o médico que se disponibilizava em trabalhar nesse setor era, em geral, aquele com formação geral. Nos últimos anos, tem crescido o número de instituições que oferecem cursos teóricos e práticos para especialização, bem como eventos e congressos sobre o tema. A primeira disciplina de graduação em emergências clínicas que se tem registro foi criada pela USP em 1992; a primeira Residência foi documentada em 1996.

No Brasil, este setor tem grande importância, pois responde por um grande volume diário de atendimentos. O médico de urgência, no Brasil, possui dois campos principais de trabalho: o Pronto-Socorro (ou Pronto-Atendimento) e o SAMU (Serviço de Atendimento Móvel de Urgência).

Em tese, o fluxo apropriado dos pacientes é ter a unidade básica de saúde como porta de entrada de acesso à saúde. Entretanto, devido a motivos culturais – resquícios de uma medicina hospitalocêntrica praticada no passado – um grande volume dos atendimentos de emergência é por queixas ambulatoriais.

 

Dia-a-dia: A rotina básica de um plantão de emergência começa com a reavaliação dos pacientes que permaneceram sob observação ao longo do último plantão. A depender da situação clínica, pode-se optar pela manutenção no próprio setor de emergência, pela internação em unidade hospitalar (própria ou transferência) ou alta com seguimento ambulatorial. Problemas frequentemente encontrados neste cenário são a indisponibilidade de leitos suficientes para internação e a dificuldade de garantir uma continuidade de atenção em nível ambulatorial da maneira apropriada.

 

Um turno na emergência: Os plantões no Brasil costumam ser de 12 ou 24 horas, sendo trocados às 7:00-19:00 ou 08:00-20:00. A dinâmica é muito diferente em serviços públicos ou privados. No primeiro, há grande número de estudantes de medicina, o grau de organização é menor (em geral, o atendimento conforme os níveis de prioridade é falho) e há, por vezes, falta de alguns recursos (materiais e humanos). No setor privado, por outro lado, há melhores condições de trabalho. No meu serviço, em geral, contamos com uma equipe de 7 médicos, sendo 4 clínicos gerais, 1 cirurgião geral, 1 ortopedista e 1 obstetra. O serviço de pediatria atua separadamente, com sua equipe própria de 2 a 4 integrantes, fazendo atendimentos de pacientes até 12 anos de idade.

 

Lembro-me de um plantão, em um hospital público, durante uma manhã de segunda-feira, em que tive a experiência de atender um paciente de meia idade, operário, trazido por colegas de trabalho, com o relato de perda súbita da consciência e queda. O paciente estava comatoso e com pressão arterial elevada. Infelizmente, como a maioria dos serviços ainda não trabalha com prontuários eletrônicos, não tínhamos acesso a qualquer histórico médico pessoal ou contato imediato com familiares. Isso tornou a condução do caso mais difícil, pois a decisão inicial sobre a condução clínica dependeria da maior probabilidade diagnóstica. Foi realizada uma tomografia de crânio, em princípio normal, mas que não descartaria acidentes vasculares cerebrais ou estado epiléptico não convulsivo. Para prosseguir com a investigação, porém, não haveria pronta disponibilidade de uma Ressonância Magnética e de um eletroencefalograma. Por esse motivo, tivemos que conduzir o paciente com base na maior probabilidade e grau de suspeição clínica, tendo conseguido realizar os exames somente depois de transferi-lo para outra unidade. Felizmente, a suspeição clínica maior era de um AVE, e o paciente foi tratado clinicamente da maneira correta.

 

Em outra ocasião, em um hospital privado, estava em um plantão noturno em que toda a unidade estava lotada. Havíamos recebido muitos pacientes que precisavam de reavaliação – para considerar alta hospitalar ou internação. Fui então comunicado, pela equipe de enfermagem, que um paciente havia apresentado parada cardiorrespiratória. O chefe do plantão – médico mais experiente – assumiu o comando da situação, orientando a equipe para os cuidados, com base no protocolo de ACLS. Felizmente, a equipe médica do hospital recebe esse treinamento regularmente. Um falha é que a maioria dos profissionais não médicos não é treinada com a mesma qualificação.

 

Funcionamento: Existem centros que atendem diferentes níveis de complexidade, bem como locais em que se trabalha na modalidade de “referenciação” – recebem somente os casos mais complexos, que necessitam de recursos físicos ou humanos indisponíveis em outros hospitais. À medida que o grau de complexidade sobe, diminui o número de unidades disponíveis. Em alguns casos, o médico do serviço público tem dificuldade de transferir o paciente para o local mais adequado para atendimento. A equipe necessária para o adequado funcionamento dessas unidades deve ser composta por médicos especialistas, enfermeiros, técnicos de enfermagem, fisioterapeutas, psicólogos e assistentes sociais.

 

Público X Privado: Trabalhar em um serviço privado, em que os pacientes tem acesso mediante pagamento, ou por possuírem um plano de saúde, difere do serviço público, no qual todos têm direito a atendimento. A disponibilidade de recursos técnicos e humanos é, muitas vezes, um fator limitante para a prática de uma medicina de qualidade nos hospitais públicos. Por vezes, ocorrem situações em que, por problemas de gestão, há carência de materiais, ou há necessidade de compras em forma de “licitação” – compra de urgência, o que representa aumento dos custos.

 

Pontos positivos de trabalhar no setor de emergência no Brasil: Diversidade de atendimentos; Resolutividade; Grande fluxo de pacientes.

 

Pontos negativos: Não há seguimento dos pacientes que se apresentam com queixas ambulatórias; Dificuldade de transferência para centros de maior complexidade.

 

Conclusão: Trabalhar com medicina de emergência no Brasil é um desafio diário. A dificuldade do aspecto clínico se soma às questões técnicas e assistenciais, e exige do médico a tomada de decisões em diversas situações críticas. Esperamos que a troca de experiências entre profissionais de diversos países sirva para melhorar nossa capacidade de lidar com os problemas mais comuns da medicina de emergência.

 

Pedro Gemal Lanzieri

www.pebmed.com.br

ENGLISH TRANSLATION

 

Emergency Medicine in Brazil

 

I am a second year internal medicine resident, having graduated in 2012 in Brazil. I’ve worked in and around Emergency Medicine (EM) over the last two years.

 

General aspects: EM differs greatly from other medical specialities. Factors such as time pressures, lack of access to a patient’s full medical history and the need to quickly establish a relationship with a patient are major challenges of daily practice.

 

Training of doctors specialized in emergency and acute care is a relatively new concept in Brazil. Previously, the most suitable doctor to work in this sector would typically be one with general training. Recent years have seen a significant increase in the number of institutions offering theoretical and practical courses specific to EM. In addition to this, there are now more events and conferences focused on EM. The first official documented programme in ‘Clinical Emergencies’ was created by Universidade de São Paulo in 1992; Medical residency in EM was first documented in 1996.

 

In Brazil, as in many countries, EM is of great importance because it accounts for a large portion of the hospital’s clinical workload. The emergency physician in Brazil has two main fields of work: the Emergency Department (or ‘emergency care’) and SAMU (Mobile Emergency).

 

In theory, the appropriate flow of patients is to have the basic health unit as a gateway to access to healthcare. However, due to cultural reasons – remnants of a hospital-centered medicine practiced in the past – a large volume of emergency visits are for outpatient complaints.

 

Day-to-Day: A typical Emergency shift begins with the reassessment of patients who remained under observation from the last shift. Depending on the clinical situation, you may choose to keep the patient in the emergency department, admit, or discharge with outpatient follow-up. The follow up may be in the primary presentation hospital or another facility. Problems frequently encountered are a poor availability of hospital beds and the difficulty of ensuring appropriate continuity of care on an outpatient basis.

 

A shift in the ER: The shifts in Brazil usually last 12 or 24 hours, with handover at 7am/pm or 8am/pm. There are great differences between private and public service emergency services. In the former, there is a large number of medical students on rotation, the department is less organized (medical triage systems do not always function) and there is, sometimes, a lack of material or human resources. In the private sector, on the other hand, there are better working conditions. In my service, in general, we have a team of 7 doctors: 4 general physicians, one general surgeon, one orthopedic surgeon and one obstetrician. The pediatric service operates separately, with its own 2-4 team members, attending patients under 12 years of age.

 

I remember a shift at the public hospital, on a Monday morning, when I saw a middle-aged laborer, brought in by coworkers, after a sudden loss of consciousness followed by fall. The patient was comatose and hypertensive. Unfortunately, because most services here do not work with electronic medical records, we had no access to any personal medical history or immediate contact with relatives. This made the case far more challenging, because the initial decision on the clinical course depended on the most likely diagnosis. A CT scan of the brain was performed – normal, but that does not rule out stroke or non-convulsive status epilepticus amongst other differentials. To proceed with investigations, we needed access to an urgent MRI and EEG. For this reason, we had to manage the patient based on our primary differential and degree of clinical suspicion, only obtaining diagnostic imaging after transfer to another facility. Fortunately, our primary differential was that of a stroke, which turned out to be the case and the patient was medically managed, making a good recovery.

 

On another occasion, now at a private hospital, I was on a night shift and the entire unit was full. We had received many patients requiring assessment with a view to deciding on discharge or admission, as previously mentioned. Suddenly, I was called by the nursing staff as a patient had collapsed from a cardiac arrest. The chief clinican – the most experienced doctor – took command of the situation, guiding the team to care, based on the international ACLS/ALS guidelines. Fortunately, the medical team receives resuscitation training regularly, and the arrest was managed well. One of the issues is that most non-medical professionals are not trained in ALS, which means that during cardiac arrests there is an even stronger onus on the physicians’ performance.

 

‘Operation’ (Tertiary Referral Centres): These are centers that cater for escalating levels of complexity, in addition to accepting the more complex cases that require physical or human resources not available in other hospitals. As the complexity increases, the number of available units decreases. In some cases, a public service doctor can have difficulty transferring the patient to the most appropriate place for care. The staff required for the proper functioning of these units is composed of general physicians, medical specialists, nurses, nurse technicians, physiotherapists, psychologists and social workers.

 

Public vs. Private: Working in a private hospital, where patients have access by direct payment, or by having a health care plan, differs from the public service, which is free at the point of care. The availability of technical and human resources is often a limiting factor for the practice of quality medicine in public hospitals. Sometimes, due to management issues, there is a shortage of medical supplies, which results in ‘last minute’ buying at a premium, which ultimately costs the hospital more money.

 

Positive aspects: Diversity of care, solving problems, wide exposure to patients.

 

Negative aspects: Lack of follow-up of patients who present with outpatient complaints, difficulty transferring patients to facilities offering specialist input.

 

Conclusion: Working with EM in Brazil is a daily challenge. The complexity of the clinical picture, compounded with technical and healthcare issues, requires firm decision making by the provider in critical situations. We hope that the exchange of experiences among professionals from different countries at Developing EM serves to improve our ability to deal with common problems of EM.

 

Please contact me if you have any questions or will be visiting Rio in the interim. Feel free to check out my website www.pebmed.com.br and the PEBmed applications on your smartphone.

 

Pedro Gemal Lanzieri

Resident in Internal Medicine

Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro

 

Outstanding Paediatric Program at DevelopingEM 2014

This year at DevelopingEM 2014 we have one of our previous presenters, Anthony Crocco, hosting an incredible Paediatric Emergency Medicine and Critical Care session on Thursday 11 September 2014.

Anthony is a Paediatric Emergency Physician currently working in the Emergency Department at the McMaster University Children’s Hospital in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

As we found out in Havana, Anthony is an amazing educator and for DevelopingEM 2014 Salvador he has assembled an amazing group of physicians including Marianne Gausche-Hill, Mary McCaskill, Billy Mallon, Sue Beno, Joe Lex, Camilo Gutierrez, Charise Kwan and Marcelo Preto-Zamperlini.

With this incredible line up we’re very excited about the Paediatric Program which has been a cornerstone of DevelopingEM’s programs from the start.

Intracranial Catastrophe – Andrew Bezzina

The next presentation is by one of my personal mentors in Emergency Medicine, Andrew Bezzina.

Andrew is a senior staff specialist in emergency departments around NSW, Australia and he is heavily involved in medical education at all levels.

He remains one of the best emergency physicians I know.

His presentation on the management of intracranial catastrophes outlines some of the controversies and potential solutions for emergency physicians for a disease process that is frequently a frustrating dynamic.

Andrew has helped DevelopingEM from the start and whilst he won’t make it to Salvador he will be supporting us from back home in Oz.

Thanks Andrew for all your support and for another great presentation.

Click here for Audio Link.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2WJUqJABK0

Slide01

 

 

 

Acute CT Interpretation in the ED – Why we shouldn’t always wait for the radiologist

The next in our series of presentation from Havana is Sanj Fernando’s presentation from the Adult ED and Critical Care session.

Sanj is an emergency and retrieval medicine physician from Sydney. He has an interest in education and has taught around the globe. During DevelopingEM 2013 he gave this presentation, organised a fantastic CT interpretation workshop and assisted with the Ultrasound Workshop. This year he is chairing our Trauma Program which is shaping up to be a standout component of the program in Salvador.

Sanj’s presentation was a great reminder that as critical care physicians we really have to own the CT so we can institute life saving therapies in a timely manner.

Listen to the audio file here.

 

Slide01

Critical Care Ultrasound for the New Era – 2013 Presentation

Continuing with our presentations from Havana the next in our series from the Adult EM and Critical Care session is from Jorge Otero on Critical Care Ultrasound for the New Era.

Jorge joined our faculty from Connecticut and is the Ultrasound Director of the Emergency Department at Waterbury Hospital. He’s also heavily involved in ultrasound education at Yale School of Medicine.

Jorge is a fluent Spanish speaker and it was great to have him on board in Havana where his presentations in Espanol were a welcome relief from the Aussie drawl for our Cuban companeros.
Jorge was also a fantastic addition to the bilingual Ultrasound workshop.

His lecture outlined some of the basics of emergency ultrasound as well as describing some of the advanced applications.

Audio File – Soundcloud

This year’s Trauma Program – DevelopingEM 2014 – Emergency Medicine Conference

Our trauma program this year will be one of the stand out components of the academic program.

The trauma program chair Sanj Fernando has organised an innovative and multifaceted program that will create a standard for our future conferences.

By combining case presentations with targeted lectures and demonstrations Sanj and his panel or experts will immerse you the audience in a novel educational medium.

To cap it off there will be as close to a real life trauma resuscitation as there is possible to be using a novel simulation device, The Cut Suit. I don’t want to give too much away, but this may be the most convincing visual, auditory and olfactory simulation you have ever seen.

Sanj is an emergency and retrieval physician with an interest in medical education. He has taught throughout Australia and around the globe. Last year in Havana he organised an outstanding CT interpretation workshop and also presented during the Adult Emergency Medicine and Critical Care session as well as assisted with the Ultrasound workshop. We’re very glad he’s involved again as he has put together an amazing program with incredible presenters which Im sure you will enjoy.

Stay tuned for more updates.

Unique Communication and De-escalation Workshop at DevelopingEM 2014

This year two of our previous DevelopingEM delegates Joachim Unger and Steffan Eriksson, are hosting an interesting workshop for you during our upcoming conference in Salvador, Brazil.

Jo and Stef are from opposite sides of the globe and from different medical backgrounds but together they have put together a great program for their Communication and De-escalation Workshop on the Thursday afternoon of our week in Salvador.

Jo is an anesthetist from Berlin with an interest in prehospital and emergency care, airway management, education and leadership in critical care. He was an enthusiastic delegate in Havana and we’re really excited to have him on our faculty. His presentations will cover topics that will interest all of you, and include strategies for improving communication between clinicians and methods to allow de-escalation of the agitated patient.

Teaming up with Jo is Steffan who is a GP from Australia. He has an interest in emergency care and also personal self defence. Steffan has been an instructor in Close Personal Protection for the Todd Group Australia which is Australasia’s oldest military and civilian unarmed combat and self defence training provider. Recently Steffan has been bringing his expertise to the instruction of health care providers to prevent injury in difficult and personally dangerous work environments. In a practical accompaniment to Jo’s lectures, Steffan will be demonstrating some simple techniques of self protection and tailoring these techniques to the hospital environment.

All in all I think this workshop will be a standout component of DevelopingEM 2014. Make sure you get in early to secure one of the 14 places in Steffan’s practical component of the workshop. The rest of you can watch from behind the ropes.

There will be more news on the program soon so stay tuned.

 

Joachim Eriksson_Steffan_Dr

St. Lucia to host first Paediatric Intensive Care Basic Course

Lisa Charles
Medical Director – Victoria Hospital

The goodwill from St. Lucia’s participation in the Developing EM Conference in Cuba continues to flow our way. This month through the hard work of Dr. Elena Cavazzoni – Paediatric Intensivist; Children’s Hospital at West mead, Australia, whom we met in Cuba and Dr. Bruce Lister – Lead Instructor; Paediatric Intensivist and Anaesthesiologist; Director of Training, Department of paediatric Critical Care Medicine, Mater Children’s Hospital , Queensland, Australia, St. Lucia will host its first ever Paediatric Intensive Care Basic Course!

We have thirty local nurses and doctors signed up for this fully sponsored course. Just over eight paediatric intensivists from as far away as New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the US and as close as Barbados will run the two day workshop – May 20th and 21st.

What is even more exciting is that our colleagues from the University of the West Indies in Barbados under the guidance of Dr. Michele Lashley together with Paeds Basic will run a train the trainer workshop so that we build capacity locally to continue training on our own.

photo (3)St. Lucia has a three bed ICU with the most basic equipment. The provision of ICU care to Paediatric patients is a challenge with the current equipment and absence of intensivists. This course is certainly a step in the right direction to elevating our ability to safely approach the initial management of critically ill paediatric patients.

We will send lots of pics and updates your way after the course.

Also update on our new portable sonosite from Matt and Mike of Ultrasound podcast is being put to great use in our ICU – the head nurse assures me that “it is being used all the time…great things are happening!”

 

The “march of folly” in Brazilian Emergency Medicine

Original article in Portuguese – see below 

By Frederick Arnaud

President of the Brazilian Association of ABRAMEDE – Emergency Medicine

A letter to the medical institutions of Brazil, including the Ministry of Health, the CFM (Federal Medicine Council), AMB (Brazilian Medical Association), CNRM (National Commission of Medical Residency) and everyone who works emergency services.

In 1984, Barbara W.Tuchman gave the world the book “The March of Folly,” which, in addition to being amazing, is admirably well written. It is a book to be read and reread, dedicated to those who are interested in the ways of humanity and who seek explanations for the mindless adoption of government policies that contrary to their own interests.

The author offers four episodes in world history as examples of symbolic moments: 1.The Trojans and their mysterious wooden horse inside the walls of Troy. 2. The inability of the Renaissance Popes to capture the importance of reformist voices and not prevent Protestant division. 3. The arrogance of the English lords that led to the process of North American liberation. 4. The American quagmire in Vietnam.

How do we understand that with policy-making power, some act so frequently in a manner contrary to reason and to the interests at stake? Why do the mental processes of these intelligent people too often seem not to work? The conclusion is offered to the reader that the main cause of folly is the ambition of power.

The lust for power is defined by Tacitus as being the “most flagrant of all the passions.” It is satisfied only when exercising power over other human beings. Governing ends up being the best way to exert power over people. But what does this have to do with Emergency Medicine in Brazil? After reflecting on the struggle for the recognition of Emergency Medicine in Brazil, I ask myself why is this recognition so difficult to attain? Why, despite all the evidence presented, technical, scientific, financial and social, our institutions insist on ignoring this issue or when they do, act so slowly and indecisively.

Numerous discussions have occurred throughout Brazil and always with the same conclusions: Emergency Medicine as a specialty is important to Brazilian medicine. The discussion is so repetitive, it’s getting boring and bland. Are they trying to overcome tiredness? As the saying goes: Why is it that more than sixty countries around the world have already taken this initiative, including the nations that lead the world in technological advancement, such as the United States, England, Australia, New Zealand , France and others, while we are still so reluctant? These countries have already demonstrated extremely positive results with such policies. It was clear that there was a substantial improvement in emergency services with benefits for the whole health system. The mortality rates of acute diseases declined, and the ethical and legal proceedings against professionals reduced significantly. The health system, doctors, and especially   patients who were provided services in skilled and humane way all benefitted. The costs were reduced, while making these services more effective and efficient. Poor practices became a rare occurrence. The new professionals, developed through the concept of the emergency physician, perform all procedures necessary for maintaining life safely and correctly. The specialization contributed to the prevention and treatment of diseases. It was the only way for the professional to get established in the field and work as more than just a “freelancer.”

It contributed to the alleviation of overcrowding, since the emergency physician has more success and hospitalizes patients only when necessary, in addition to requesting tests correctly when appropriate. In countries where Emergency Medicine is a specialty, the professional is respected and paid well, unlike our current situation where working conditions are inhumane and wages are demeaning. The professional is humiliated, abused and doesn’t stay very long in the profession. The chaos in emergencies continues, while having meetings and more meetings, discussions and more discussions. The emergency continues with little prospect of change. Would in not be, ladies and gentlemen, our institutional FOLLY to continue to discuss the issue without actually doing anything?

Returning to the book “The March of Folly,” did anyone suspect that huge horse? How many Christians denounced indulgences without doing anything? No matter how much counsel they received, the Americans still entered Vietnam, and we all saw the result.  Well friends, the conclusion is that a similar process in happening in Brazilian medicine today, despite all the talk, all the forums, and all the evidence. Reactionary forces with threats to their power continue to prevent what is already more than clear to most professionals. People who do not work in an emergency or know the emergency and mostly do not live the emergency continue to prevent it from becoming established. Who cares about this chaos? The cause of the foolishness, once again, is the lust for power, both financial and social.

The saddest thing is that this nonsense is transformed into deaths every day at thousands of emergency services sites across the country. This foolishness is transformed into poor treatment, humiliation and prejudice toward professionals who are dedicated to their jobs. The folly will lead to the extermination of an ideal that is legitimate, true and necessary to our health system and our population. It is encouraging to know that we will not rest and will continue to defend this idea, which can initiate the process of transforming our emergencies and place them at the level of importance they deserve. We will not allow our minds to command the folly and we will always march in order to do what is best for the patient: the beginning, middle and end of our profession. So I urge our institutions that seek to provide answers to Brazilian physicians, in the most brief and emphatic manner possible: Why is Emergency Medicine not yet a specialty in this country? To conclude, we will repeat the phrase coined by John Kennedy: “The problems of the world cannot possibly be solved by skeptics or cynics whose horizons are limited by the obvious realities. We need men who can dream of things that never were.”

I, physician, work in medical emergency 36 hours a week in shifts and 24 hours a day as a manager.

 

A marcha da insensatez  NA MEDICINA DE EMERGÊNCIA BRASILEIRA

Carta endereçada as Instituições Médicas deste País: CFM, AMB, CNRM, Ministério da Saúde e a todos que trabalham nos serviços de emergência do Brasil

No ano de 1984, Barbara W.Tuchman premiou o mundo com o livro “A marcha da insensatez” que, além de surpreendente, é admiravelmente bem escrito. Obra para ser lida e relida, dedicada aos que se interessam pelos caminhos da humanidade e procuram explicações para a insensata adoção, por muitos governantes, de políticas contrárias aos seus próprios interesses.
A autora oferece quatro episódios da história mundial como exemplo de momentos muito emblemáticos: (1) Os troianos puxam o misterioso cavalo de madeira para dentro dos muros de Tróia; (2) Os Papas da Renascença não captam a importância das vozes reformistas e não impedem a cisão protestante; (3) A arrogância dos lordes ingleses detona o processo de libertação da América do Norte; (4) Os americanos se atolam no Vietnã.
Como entender que, com poder de decisão política, alguns ajam, tão frequentemente, de forma contrária àquela apontada pela razão e pelos próprios interesses em jogo? Por que o processo mental dessas inteligências, também, tão frequentemente, parece não funcionar? A conclusão final oferecida ao leitor é que a principal causa da insensatez é a ambição do poder.
A ambição do poder é definida por Tácito como sendo a “mais flagrante de todas as paixões”. Ela só se satisfaz quando exerce o poder sobre os demais seres humanos. Governar acaba sendo a melhor forma de exercer o poder sobre as pessoas.
Mas o que isso tem a ver com a Medicina de Emergência no BRASIL? Após refletir sobre a luta para o reconhecimento da Medicina de Emergência no Brasil, passo a me perguntar por que está sendo tão difícil esse reconhecimento? Por que, apesar de todas as evidências apresentadas, técnicas, científicas, sociais e financeiras, as nossas instituições insistem em ignorar esse problema ou quando o fazem, atuam de forma lenta e discreta.
Inúmeros debates já ocorreram em todo o Brasil e sempre com as mesmas conclusões: Medicina de Emergência como especialidade é importante para a medicina  brasileira. A discussão, de tão repetitiva, já está ficando enfadonha e sem graça. Será que estão querendo vencer no cansaço? Como diz o dito popular: Por que será que mais de 60 países no mundo já tomaram essa iniciativa, entre elas as nações que comandam o conhecimento e a tecnologia mundial, como Estados Unidos, Inglaterra, Austrália, Nova Zelândia, França e outros enquanto nós ainda relutamos tanto? Estes países já apresentaram seus dados extremamente positivos com tal ação. Ficou claro que houve uma melhora substancial nos serviços de emergência, com benefícios para todo o sistema de saúde. A mortalidade de doenças agudas diminuiu; os processos éticos e jurídicos contra os profissionais reduziram de forma importante. Ganharam o médico, o sistema de saúde e, principalmente, o doente que passou a ser atendido de forma qualificada e humanizada. Os custos nos serviços foram equilibrados tornando estes mais eficazes e econômicos. A má prática passou a ser fato raro. Os novos profissionais, formados através do conceito do médico emergencista, realizam todos os procedimentos necessários à manutenção da vida de forma segura e correta. A especialização contribuiu para a prevenção e tratamento das doenças. Foi a única forma de o profissional se estabelecer no serviço e não utilizar o plantão apenas como um “bico” . Contribuiu para a diminuição da superlotação, já que o médico emergencista dá mais altas com segurança e interna apenas o necessário, além de solicitar exames de forma correta, ou seja, com indicação adequada. Nos países onde a Medicina de Emergência é uma especialidade, o profissional é bem conceituado e bem remunerado, diferente de nossa situação atual onde as condições de trabalho são desumanas e os salários são aviltantes. O profissional é humilhado, maltratado e dificilmente permanece muito tempo no setor. O caos nas emergências continua, enquanto fazemos reuniões e mais reuniões, discussões e mais discussões.  A emergência continua com poucas perspectivas de mudanças. Não seria, senhores, uma INSENSATEZ de nossas instituições, permanecer discutindo o tema, sem efetivamente nada transformar? Voltando ao livro “A marcha da insensatez”, será que ninguém desconfiava daquele cavalo enorme? Quantos cristãos denunciaram as indulgências e ninguém fez nada?  Por mais que aconselhassem os americanos, eles entraram no Vietnam e todos viram o resultado. Pois, amigos, chegamos à conclusão que processo semelhante acontece hoje na medicina brasileira, apesar de todas as discussões, de todos os fóruns, de todas as evidências.  Forças reacionárias, ameaçadas no seu poder, conseguem barrar o que já está mais que claro para a maioria dos profissionais. Pessoas que não trabalham na emergência, não conhecem a emergência e principalmente não vivem a emergência conseguem impedir sua estruturação. A quem interessa esse caos? A causa  da insensatez, mais uma vez, é a paixão pelo poder, seja ele social ou financeiro. O mais triste é que essa insensatez é transformada em mortes todos os dias nos milhares serviços de emergência de todo o país. Essa insensatez é transformada  em maus tratos, humilhações e preconceitos aos profissionais que se dedicam a esta área. A insensatez levará ao extermínio de um ideal que é legítimo, verdadeiro e necessário ao nosso sistema de saúde e à nossa população. De alento serve saber que não descansaremos e continuaremos a defender esta ideia, única que pode dar início ao processo de transformação de nossas emergências e colocá-las no patamar de importância que elas merecem. Não deixaremos que a insensatez comande nossas mentes e marcharemos sempre com o propósito de fazer o que é melhor para o paciente: começo, meio e fim de nossa profissão. Por isso conclamo as nossas instituições que busquem oferecer respostas aos médicos brasileiros, de forma mais breve e enfática. Porque Medicina de Emergência ainda não é uma especialidade neste País? Para concluir, repetiremos a frase cunhada por John Kennedy: “Os problemas do mundo não podem ser resolvidos por céticos ou por cínicos, cujos horizontes se limitam as realidades evidentes. Temos a necessidade de homens capazes de imaginar o que nunca existiu”.

 

Eu, médico, trabalho na emergência 36horas por semana como plantonista e 24h diárias como gestor.

 

Frederico Arnaud

Presidente da ABRAMEDE- Associação Brasileira de Medicina de Emergência

http://www.abramede.com.br
ABRAMEDE-logo

 

 

 

Ultrasound Podcast joins DevelopingEM Brazil – 2 Day Workshop

Limited places available for this unmatched Ultrasound Workshop experience at an unbeatable price!

Ultrasound Podcast Sambafest 13th-14th September 2014

Due to the overwhelming positive feedback from the ultrasound workshops at previous conferences, we have added a two day post conference workshop to the end of the Brazil conference this year.

Presented in person by Drs Mike Mallin and Matt Dawson from the popular and innovative Ultrasound Podcastit is sure to be an event not to be missed. Limited spaces available!

As always, we’ll focus mainly on the hands-on approach to capture the ultrasound experience.

 

To book, register for the conference today, and select the Ultrasound Workshop during the registration process. If you have already registered for the conference, log in to add the workshop to your registration. The cost of the workshop is USD $595.

You get all the lecture material ahead of time in very easy to consume video format that can be played on your computer, tablet, or smartphone. You watch this material as many times as you like while traveling, while working out, while doing the dishes, or wherever you’re able to learn. The day of course we will have a very short review of the main points from the lecture. Then we scan!

This allows the team more time to assist you with actual hands on ultrasound skills, and gives you more time to enjoy Salvador de Bahia.

Here are the topics that will be covered each day. You’ll receive this material to view in the month preceding the actual conference.


Schedule

Day 1

Benefits / Introduction / Physics / Knobology
Trauma
Basic Cardiac
Vascular access
Aorta
RUSH

Day 2

Appendix
Soft Tissue
DVT
GB
Pelvic
Renal